Mountjoy

Mountjoy v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20242:15-cv-02204California2,077 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALVIN MOUNTJOY, No. 2:15-cv-02204-DJC-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER EXCLUDING TESTIMONY FROM PLAINTIFF’S FORMER SPOUSE

SETERUS, INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Two days into trial, Plaintiff Calvin Mountjoy seeks to introduce testimony from his former spouse, Tracy, a witness never disclosed. Plaintiff argues that Tracy will serve as a rebuttal witness, but Plaintiff has failed to comply with the procedures laid out in this Court’s Trial Confirmation Order (ECF No. 118) for bringing in previously undisclosed witnesses, even as a purported rebuttal witness — let alone complying with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, for the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s request to introduce the testimony of his former spouse, Tracy. //// //// //// BACKGROUND This case was initially removed to the Eastern District of California on October 22, 2015. (See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.