Mountjoy
Mountjoy v. Bank of America, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALVIN MOUNTJOY, No. 2:15-cv-02204-DJC-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER EXCLUDING TESTIMONY FROM PLAINTIFF’S FORMER SPOUSE
SETERUS, INC.,
15 Defendant. 16 17 Two days into trial, Plaintiff Calvin Mountjoy seeks to introduce testimony from his former spouse, Tracy, a witness never disclosed. Plaintiff argues that Tracy will serve as a rebuttal witness, but Plaintiff has failed to comply with the procedures laid out in this Court’s Trial Confirmation Order (ECF No. 118) for bringing in previously undisclosed witnesses, even as a purported rebuttal witness — let alone complying with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, for the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s request to introduce the testimony of his former spouse, Tracy. //// //// //// BACKGROUND This case was initially removed to the Eastern District of California on October 22, 2015. (See…