Dunn

Dunn v. HUD / Urban Development

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20241:23-cv-01565California608 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALANA DUNN, Case No. 1:23-cv-01565 JLT SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS

v. CASE BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM

HUD/URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., (Doc. 7) Defendants. 16 Alana Dunn is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action, which she initiated 17 by filing a complaint on November 6, 2023. (Doc. 1.) On November 28, 2023, the assigned 18 magistrate judge found Plaintiff did not state any cognizable claim. (Doc. 5 at 4–8.) Plaintiff was 19 granted thirty days in which to file an amended complaint “so that she can set forth a basis for 20 subject matter jurisdiction and specify her claims with additional factual allegations.” (Id. at 8.) 21 On December 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (Doc. 6.) The magistrate 22 judge screened the amended complaint on January 18, 2024, and issued Findings and 23 Recommendations to dismiss the action. (Doc. 7.) The magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.