Quiring

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LORENZO CASTENEDA, Case No. 2:21-cv-02196 DAD KJN P 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER 13 v. 14 J. QUIRING, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Defendants Chamberlin, McTaggart, Arteaga, Quiring, Rowe, and Medina move for a seven-day extension of the February 13, 2024 filing deadline for pretrial motions due to the temporary illness of defense counsel. “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.’” Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Johnson, 975 F.2d…