Crockett

Crockett v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20242:23-cv-01562California2,666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PATRICIA ANN CROCKETT, an No. 2:23-cv-01562-TLN-KJN individual, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corporation and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Patricia A. Crockett’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 9.) Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action concerns an employment dispute between the parties. On or about June 28, 2016, Defendant employed Plaintiff as a cashier at Defendant’s Wal-Mart store in Fairfield, California. (ECF No. 1-2 at 10, 13.) In 2021, Plaintiff was injured while working and then placed on modified work duty. (Id. at 13.) In November 2021, Plaintiff moved to temporary disability status and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.