Sanders

Sanders v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20241:22-cv-00577California701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILIP SANDERS, No. 1:22-cv-0577 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR A

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION,

ROBERT HICKS and J. LARA, DISMISSING THE FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO

Defendants. AMEND, AND DENYING THE MOTION

TO AMEND AS MOOT

16 (Docs. 12, 14, and 16)

Philip Sanders asserts Robert Hicks and J. Lara violated his civil rights, and he seeks a preliminary injunction directing actions by the Fresno County Sherriff Department and Fresno Superior Court. (Docs. 10, 12.) The assigned magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 14 at 5- 10.) The magistrate judge noted that Plaintiff was previously “provided with guidance and the appropriate legal standards, [but] Plaintiff was unable to cure the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.