Essex

(PC) Washington v. Essex

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20242:12-cv-03054California843 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, No. 2:12-cv-03054-DAD-DB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ESSEX’S

UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO SEAL

C. ESSEX, et al., (Doc. No. 227) Defendants.

16 On February 2, 2024, defendant Craig Essex filed a notice of his request to seal Exhibit C to the declaration of Seth A. Curtis filed in support of his opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 227.) In his request, defendant Essex explains that there are compelling reasons sufficient to outweigh the public’s interest in disclosure of court records because Exhibit C to the Curtis declaration consists of plaintiff’s medical records and contain confidential information regarding plaintiff’s health and medical care. (Id. at 2; see also Doc. Nos. 226-1 at 38–63; 226-2 at 1–4.) Plaintiff did not submit an opposition to defendant Essex’s request to seal. For the reasons explained below, the defendant Essex’s request to seal Exhibit C to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.