Acosta

(PC) Brookins v. Acosta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20241:19-cv-00401California4,647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY L. BROOKINS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00401-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

v. (Doc. No. 60-3) F. ACOSTA,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

Defendant. GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT1

16 (Doc. No. 60) 17 14-DAY DEADLINE 18 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant F. Acosta on November 16, 2023. (Doc. No. 60, “MSJ”). Plaintiff filed an Opposition (Doc. No. 64) and Defendant filed a Reply. (Doc. No. 65). The undersigned, finding no dispute of material fact as to whether Plaintiff’s federal claim is barred by res judicata, recommends Defendant’s MSJ be granted. I. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Contained within Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is a Request for Judicial Notice. (Doc. No. 60-3). Defendant requests the Court to take judicial notice of “the existence

28 1 This matter was referred to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.