(PC) Love v. CDCR Health Care Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20242:21-cv-00652California2,867 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL DEMONZE LOVE, No. 2:21-cv-0652 DJC CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CDCR HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 9, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court found that plaintiff could proceed on claims for inadequate medical care arising under the Eighth Amendment against defendants Dr. Alomoda1 and Nurse Burley. The court ordered service of process on those defendants (ECF No. 13) and answers were filed by Burley (ECF No. 23) and Alamutu (ECF No. 33). Defendants Alamutu and Burley (defendants) now move for summary judgment. ECF No. 46. ///// 27 1 Defendant Alamutu is identified as “Dr. Alomoda” in the First Amended Complaint but was subsequently identified as Nurse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.