Navarro

(PC) Lear v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20241:21-cv-00600California3,521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR, Case No. 1:21-cv-00600-NODJ-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

v. (ECF No. 90)

NAVARRO, et al., ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DECLARE

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendants. JUDGMENT FILED IN BAD FAITH AND

FOR SANCTIONS

(ECF No. 92)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

I. Procedural History

19 Plaintiff Roderick William Lear (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 21 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Navarro, Neve, and Allison 22 (“Defendants”) for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising from the 23 incident on January 4, 2020. 24 On May 13, 2022, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that 25 Plaintiff failed to exhaust his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.