(HC) Taylor v. District Attorney Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20242:23-cv-00460California800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT TAYLOR, No. 2:23-cv-00460-DAD-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, (Doc. Nos. 21, 22) Respondent.

16 Petitioner Robert Taylor is a detainee in county jail proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 24, 2024, the undersigned issued an order adopting the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 16) and dismissing this action due to petitioner’s failure to state a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief in his operative second amended petition. (Doc. No. 19.) Specifically, the court explained that because petitioner’s state criminal conviction has not yet become final, he has failed to exhaust his habeas claims by first presenting them to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.