John

(PC) Rysedorph v. John

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20241:23-cv-00251California428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED KRISTOPHER RYSEDORPH, No. 1:23-cv-00251-NODJ-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

v. DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS

JOHN, et al., (ECF No. 30) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jared Kristopher Rysedorph is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 29, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action proceed against Defendants Randy Le and Anu Banerjee for deliberate indifference to medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 30.) The Magistrate Judge further recommended that all other claims and defendants be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Id. at 15.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.