Harper

Harper v. Charter Communications, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20242:19-cv-00902California630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 LIONEL HARPER, DANIEL SINCLAIR, No. 2:19-cv-00902 WBS DMC HASSAN TURNER, LUIS VAZQUEZ, and PEDRO ABASCAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and all ORDER aggrieved employees, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v.

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

18 Defendant.

20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Plaintiffs request to seal certain exhibits to their 22 motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to the parties’ 23 stipulated protective order. (Docket No. 361.) These exhibits 24 are defendant Charter’s sales commission plan for account 25 executives and accompanying attachments. (Docket Nos. 360-10 to 26 27 While plaintiffs move to seal, the documents originated 28 -12.) A party seeking to seal a judicial record bears the burden of overcoming a strong presumption in favor of public access. Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). Where a party seeks to seal an attachment related to a dispositive pleading, the party must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.