Griffith

(PC) Warren v. Griffith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20241:21-cv-00120California4,286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC WARREN, Case No. 1:21-cv-00120-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT DEFENDANT’S EXHAUSTION

v. BASED MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT1

NKIRUKA NDU, (Doc. No. 25) Defendant. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Nkiruka Ndu on October 31, 2023. (Doc. No. 25, “MSJ”). Plaintiff filed an Opposition (Doc. No. 27), and Defendant filed a Reply (Doc. No. 28). The undersigned, finding no dispute of material fact, recommends Defendant’s MSJ be granted. I. BACKGROUND A. Summary of Plaintiff’s Complaint Plaintiff Eric Warren (“Plaintiff” or “Warren”), a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Warren proceeds on his second amended complaint. (Doc. No. 13, “SAC”). The Court screened the SAC

28 1 This matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.