(PS) Pinzon v. CA Dept. Health Care Serv.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20242:23-cv-00008California2,807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABRAHAM G. PINZON, No. 2:23-cv-0008 DJC DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF HEALTH

CARE SVCS.,

15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Abraham G. Pinzon is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff commenced this action on January 3, 2023, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Plaintiff’s complaint largely consists of allegations of wrongdoing asserted against the Northern District of California. On April 24, 2023, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed without further leave to amend. (ECF No. 8.) Thereafter,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.