Lopez

(PC) Crane v. Lopez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20241:22-cv-00922California1,321 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00922-NODJ-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF No. 50) G. LOPEZ, et al.,

Defendants. 16 On September 20, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued an Order denying Plaintiff’s five motions for default judgment (ECF Nos. 29-33) and two additional associated motions (ECF Nos. 36, 42), and rejecting five related requests for entry of default (ECF Nos. 37-41). (See ECF No. 44.) On October 23, 2023, Plaintiff filed a “Request for Reconsideration” (“Motion”). (ECF No. 50.) Because the Motion was not filed within 28 days of the final judgment being challenged, the Court construes the Motion as made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) for relief from a final judgment, order, or proceeding. Rule 60(b) provides relief from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.