(HC) Diaz v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20241:23-cv-01783California824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO DIAZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-01783-SKO (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DISMISS PETITION

Respondent.

16 On December 29, 2023, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court. The Court subsequently issued an order directing Petitioner to amend the Respondent. (Doc. 4.) Petitioner was granted thirty (30) days to comply with the court order, and he was advised that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that the petition be dismissed. Over thirty (30) days have passed and Petitioner has not complied. Therefore, the Court will recommend the petition be dismissed. DISCUSSION Local Rule 110 provides that a “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.