Baeza

(PC) John E. Mitchell v. Baeza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20241:20-cv-00857California820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00857-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR STAY

v.

H. BAEZA, et al., (Doc. No. 39)

Defendants. ORDER NOTING VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.

41(a)(1)(A)(i) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) OF

CERTAIN CLAIMS

17 (Doc. No. 40)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REVISE

DOCKET TO REFLECT ONLY NAMED

DEFENDANTS

20 Plaintiff John Edward Mitchell, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 18, 2024, this Court issued a screening order on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (Doc. No. 36). As discussed in the Court’s screening order, the SAC states cognizable (1) First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Baeza and Gutierrez; (2) Eighth Amendment Failure to Protect claims against Defendants Baeza, Gutierrez, Valencia-Mendoza, John Doe #1, Parra, and Vang,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.