(PS) Legardy v. Subway Sandwich Shop

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLETCHER LEGARDY, No. 2:23-cv-01897-DJC-CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOP, Defendant. 16 On January 4, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 9), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Additionally, while Plaintiff has since filed an amended complaint, the time to file such an amended…