Eaton

(PC) Roman v. Eaton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20241:23-cv-00671California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISIDRO ROMAN, No. 1:23-cv-00671-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION PATRICK EATON, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS

Defendants. AND DEFENDANTS (ECF No. 16) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 18, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and found that he stated cognizable a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendant K. Jackson. (ECF No. 15.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was granted one final opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (Id.) On February 12, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent to proceed on the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.