Kelso

(PC) Puckett v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20241:23-cv-00054California1,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:23-cv-00054-NODJ-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER RECALLING DECEMBER 22, 2023

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. No. 61) J. BARRIOS, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendants. TO AMEND COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 67) ORDER MODIFYING DISCOVERY

SCHEDULING ORDER

18 (Doc. No. 43) 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed on January 11, 2024. (Doc. No. 67, “Motion”). Plaintiff accompanies his Motion with a proposed Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 68). In his Third Amended Complaint, Plaintiff corrects the name for the Defendant previously identified as “Officer Gutierrez” and substitutes the name for a previously identified Jane Doe Defendant. (Id. at 1). Defendants Barrios, Hernandez, and White filed an Opposition. (Doc. No. 70). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.