Warden
(HC) Ojo v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 OLANREWAJU TUNDE OJO, No. 2:23-cv-1096-WBS KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, F.C.I. HERLONG, Respondent. 17 ----oo0oo---- Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Docket No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 3, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations recommending that the case be dismissed under Local Rule 110 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) based on petitioner’s failure to respond to the Magistrate Judge’s order to show cause after petitioner did not respond to respondent’s motion to dismiss. (Docket Nos. 8, 9.) The findings and recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice to all parties that any objections to…