Young

(PC) Davis v. Young

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20242:23-cv-02461California256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNIQUE ANGEL DAVIS, No. 2:23-cv-2461 CKD Plaintiff, v. YOUNG, ORDER AND Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 On January 2, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The amended complaint was due on February 1, 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.