(PC) Callins v. Mason

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20241:22-cv-00603California988 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

DISCUSSION

23 Defendants submit that Plaintiff paroled during the pendency of the action and filed a 24 notice of change of address on August 7, 2023. Since that time, an active warrant has issued for 25 Plaintiff’s arrest, and his whereabouts are currently unknown to his parole officer. Defendants 26 intend to proceed with taking Plaintiff’s deposition, and then preparing and filing a motion for 27 summary judgment in the case. Because Plaintiff’s service address of record on file with the 28 Court is no longer accurate, Defendants’ counsel is unable to serve Plaintiff with notice of his deposition. Further, counsel has been unable to contact Plaintiff to discuss scheduling his deposition at the telephone numbers Plaintiff last provided to his parole officer. Therefore, Defendants move the Court to issue an order for Plaintiff to file a notice of his current address. Local Rule 183 provides, in pertinent part:

6 [a] party appearing in propria persona shall keep the Court and opposing parties advised as to his or her current address. If mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and if such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.