Chenalo

(PC) Thomas v. Chenalo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20241:19-cv-01185California1,158 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERT EUGENE THOMAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01185-NODJ-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STRIKE AND TERMINATING

v. MOTION ASSOCIATED WITH

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION1

SALAS, MEDINA, FLORES, and C/O #1 THIRD WATCH, (Doc. Nos. 50, 52, 53) 15 Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s construed exhaustion-based, cross motion for summary filed on October 20, 2023. (Doc. No. 50, “Plaintiff’s MSJ”). In response, Defendants filed a Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s MSJ, asserting that Plaintiff’s MSJ is untimely as it was filed more than four months past the deadline for dispositive motions. (Doc. No. 52). Plaintiff filed a construed opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Strike. (See Doc. No. 53). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion to Strike. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE In his MSJ, Plaintiff asserts he is entitled to summary judgment on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.