Marley

(PC) Jackson v. Marley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20241:23-cv-00149California675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00149-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER NOTING VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.

v. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) OF HERMINA MARLEY, et al., CERTAIN CLAIMS Defendants. (Doc. No. 10) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REVISE

DOCKET TO REFLECT ONLY NAMED

DEFENDANTS 18 19 20 Plaintiff Cornel Jackson, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 16, 2024, this Court issued a screening order on Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (Doc. No. 9). As discussed in the Court’s screening order, the Court found the FAC states cognizable claims against Defendants Quick, Marley, Followill, Ramos, Cortes, and Rivera in their individual capacities for First Amendment retaliation, First Amendment right to communication with counsel, Sixth Amendment right to assistance of 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.