(PC) Salido v. Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20241:23-cv-01395California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IGNACIO SALIDO, JR., No. 1:23-cv-01395-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (ECF No. 12) BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on September 25, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On November 8, 2023, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the November 8, 2023 order. Therefore, on December 19, 2023, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the order to show cause. Thus, on January 26, 2024, Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.