Escobedo
Escobedo v. Jensen & Pilegard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOSE ESCOBEDO,
9 Case No. 1:24-cv-00088-SKO Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION
JENSEN & PILEGARD, et al., 14 DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 13 14 On January 18, 2024, Plaintiff Jose Escobedo (“Plaintiff”) filed his complaint against 15 Defendants Jensen & Pilegard, Ryan Pilegard, Brent D. Pilegard, Gregory C. Pilegard , Ryan 16 Pilegard, Cole Pilegard, Celeste Pilegard, and Ellen Pilegard, Trustee of the Ellen Pilegard Living 17 Trust u/d/t/ dated February 25, 2011 (“Defendants”), alleging claims under the American with 18 Disabilities Act (“ADA”), California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), and California’s 19 Health and Safety Code. (Doc. 1). These claims stem from alleged barriers Plaintiff encountered 20 (such as a lack of accessible parking) while he visited a facility owned, operated, or leased by 21 Defendants—Jensen & Pilegard. (See id.) 22 Based upon the Ninth Circuit opinion in Vo v. Choi, the Court will order Plaintiff to show 23 cause why the…