Pai

(PC) Williams v. Pai

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20242:19-cv-01591California1,691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN GREGORY WILLIAMS, No. 2:19-cv-01591 DAD AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER USHA PAMEMANGALOR PAI, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. This action proceeds against defendant Dr. Pai, the sole defendant, on the claim that she was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's serious medical needs following his surgery in February 2019. ECF No. 7 (screening order). Currently pending before the court is defendant’s motion to compel discovery responses from plaintiff. ECF No. 43. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part, and plaintiff will be ordered to serve a supplemental response to defendant’s request for production of documents. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.