Block

I. INTRODUCTION

19 On January 17, 2024, Plaintiff Hendrik Block (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default judgment against Defendants Eskandar T. Alzamzami, individually and dba Fatboy Market, and Nahla Mohammed Muharram (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 18.) No opposition to Plaintiff’s motion was filed. The Court has reviewed the motion and supporting documentation and determines that the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). As such, the hearing on the motion set for February 21, 2024, shall be VACATED. For the reasons set forth below, the Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be GRANTED IN PART in the amount of $2,538.15. 28 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On January 12, 2023, Plaintiff Hendrik Block (“Plaintiff”) filed his complaint against Defendants alleging claims under the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, and California’s Health and Safety Code. (Doc. 1). These claims stem from alleged barriers Plaintiff encountered (such as a lack of designated accessible parking stalls) while 6 …