Baraona

(PC) Puckett v. Baraona

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20241:21-cv-01448California2,493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-NODJ-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

v. (ECF No. 68)

BARAONA, et al., ORDER GRANTING FINAL EXTENSION

OF DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE

Defendants. MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE AND

PROPOSED SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITH INFORMATION

IDENTIFYING DOE DEFENDANTS

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants A. Baraona, R. Burnitzki,1 R. Leos, H. Hernandez, E. Diaz, and Doe 1 for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, R. Martinez, E. Ruiz, G. Meier,2 R. Gutierrez, J. Cruz, K. Allison (Cronister), and Jane Doe Nurse for failure to protect…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.