Baraona
(PC) Puckett v. Baraona
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20241:21-cv-01448California2,493 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-NODJ-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL
v. (ECF No. 68)
BARAONA, et al., ORDER GRANTING FINAL EXTENSION
OF DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
Defendants. MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE AND
PROPOSED SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT WITH INFORMATION
IDENTIFYING DOE DEFENDANTS
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
18 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants A. Baraona, R. Burnitzki,1 R. Leos, H. Hernandez, E. Diaz, and Doe 1 for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, R. Martinez, E. Ruiz, G. Meier,2 R. Gutierrez, J. Cruz, K. Allison (Cronister), and Jane Doe Nurse for failure to protect…