(PC) Felix v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20241:24-cv-00014California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SCOTT EMERSON FELIX, 1:24-cv-00014-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

GRANTING IFP APPLICATION

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 4, 6) 15 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 § 1983. Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit by filing a complaint on January 4, 2024. (ECF No. 1). 18 Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor applied to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and so on January 8, 2024, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to do either within 30 days. (ECF No. 3). On February 9, 2024, Plaintiff mailed the Court a notice (ECF No. 4), docketed on February 15, 2024, detailing the difficulties he was experiencing obtaining the ledger report required by the IFP application. Plaintiff asked for additional time to pay file his IFP application.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.