(SS) Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20241:22-cv-01360California5,751 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADA ELIZABETH VARGAS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01360-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND AFFIRMING THE

MARTIN O’MALLEY, DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SOCIAL SECURITY2

SECURITY,1 (Doc. Nos. 16, 21) Defendant. 17 18 Ada Elizabeth Vargas (“Plaintiff”), seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the undersigned on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 16, 21-22). For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, grants Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.