(PC) Suggett v. Solano County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20242:23-cv-00907California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LAYLA SUGGETT, Case No. 2:23-cv-00907-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 16, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file objections has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.