Kernan

(PC) Adkins v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20242:19-cv-00458California760 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, No. 2:19-CV-0458-DAD-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SCOTT KERNAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s 19 June 6, 2023, order denying Plaintiff’s motions to compel. See ECF No. 91. Defendants have 20 filed an opposition. See ECF No. 94. Plaintiff has filed a reply. See ECF No. 96. 21 The Court may grant reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 22 59(e) and 60. Generally, a motion for reconsideration of a final judgment is appropriately 23 brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Backlund v. Barnhart, 778 F.2d 24 1386, 1388 (9th Cir. 1985) (discussing reconsideration of summary judgment); see also 25 Schroeder v. McDonald, 55 F.3d 454, 458-59 (9th Cir. 1995). 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 Under Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.