Jiminez

(PC) Taylor v. Jiminez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20241:19-cv-00068California1,836 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 1:19-cv-00068-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

JIMINEZ, et al., (ECF No. 45)

Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 I. Introduction Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Jimenez,1 Rodriguez, Huckleberry, Rye, and Hernandez for excessive force and deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On December 22, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, together with a request for judicial notice. (ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on January 18, 2022, (ECF No. 50), and Defendants filed a reply on January 26, 2022, (ECF No. 51). The motion is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.