Jiminez

(PC) Taylor v. Jiminez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20241:19-cv-00068California1,836 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 1:19-cv-00068-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

13 v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

14 JIMINEZ, et al., (ECF No. 45)

15 Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 20 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Jimenez,1 Rodriguez, Huckleberry, Rye, 21 and Hernandez for excessive force and deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth 22 Amendment. 23 On December 22, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, together 24 with a request for judicial notice. (ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on January 18, 25 2022, (ECF No. 50), and Defendants filed a reply on January 26, 2022, (ECF No. 51). The 26 motion is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.