(PC) Bradford v. De Franco

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-CV-2169-DJC-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEREMY DE FRANCO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s supplemental complaint (erroneously 19 docketed as a motion for preliminary injunctive relief). See ECF No. 22. 20 In his filing, which is captioned “Supplemental Complaint,” Plaintiff alleges 21 conduct by various non-party prison officials occurring From May 2018 and February 2023 22 “through to date.” Id. at 3. It appears that Plaintiff seeks to supplement the original complaint to 23 add these new parties and allegations. 24 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d), the Court may permit a party to 25 serve a supplemental pleading setting out any transaction, occurrent, or event that happened after 26 the date of the pleading to be supplemented. See Fed. R. Civ. P.…