Ariza

(HC) Haapaniemi v. Ariza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20241:23-cv-00635California1,861 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 BJORN ERIK HAAPANIEMI, Case No. 1:23-cv-00635-SAB-HC

11 Petitioner, ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 5, 2024

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION,

12 v. GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS, DISMISSING PETITION FOR

13 ARIZA, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, DIRECTING

CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE,

14 Respondent. AND DECLINING TO ISSUE A

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

15 (ECF Nos. 11, 15) 16 17 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2241. 19 On February 5, 2024, the Court issued findings and recommendation recommending 20 Respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted and the petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 21 (ECF No. 15.) The parties have now consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate 22 Judge. (ECF No. 17.) Accordingly, the Court vacates the February 5, 2024 findings and 23 recommendation and issues this order granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss for the reasons 24 set forth in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.