Desimone

(PC) Mora v. Desimone

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20242:23-cv-00155California1,423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISMAIL MORA, No. 2:23-CV-0155-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CHRISTOPHER DESIMONE, et al., Defendants. 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant Overby’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. ECF No. 30. Defendant Overby argues that he should be dismissed as a defendant to this action under the favorable termination rule of Heck v. Humphrey. Plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition. ECF No. 31. Motions for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) are similar to motions under Rule 12(b) in that judgment on the pleadings is appropriate if “. . . it is clear that no relief could be granted under any set of facts that could be proven consistent with the allegations.” McGlinchy v. Shell Chemical Co., 845 F.2d 802, 810 (9th Cir. 1988). Rather than testing whether the factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.