Gooch

(PC) Hammler v. Gooch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20241:19-cv-00653California943 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No.: 1:19-cv-00653 JLT EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

13 v. (Doc. 131) 14 GOOCH, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, the case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s 20 Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a serious risk of harm against Defendant 21 Salcedo and his Eighth Amendment medical indifference claims against Defendants Gooch, 22 Salcedo, and Burnes. (Docs. 14, 23, 97.) These claims stem from Defendants’ alleged inaction in 23 responding to (1) the risk a fire in the prison posed to Plaintiff’s safety and (2) his resulting 24 medical needs. (Doc. 124.) A jury trial is set to start in this case on March 19, 2024. (Id.) 25 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 131). In the motion, 26 Plaintiff alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.