Campose

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER ELLIOTT, No. 2:22-CV-1236-KJM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 M. CAMPOSE, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Christopher Elliot, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. 19 ECF No. 24. Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendant filed a reply. ECF Nos. 25, 26. 20 In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of 21 material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93-94 (2007). The 22 Court must also construe the alleged facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Scheuer 23 v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974); see also Hosp. Bldg. Co. v. Rex Hosp. Trustees, 425 U.S. 24 738, 740 (1976); Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir. 1994). All ambiguities or doubts 25 must also be resolved in the plaintiff's favor. See Jenkins…