Sonn

(PC) Lamar v. Sonn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20241:23-cv-00462California598 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEVIN TREVONE LAMAR, III, Case No. 1:23-cv-00462-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

13 v. PROCEDURE 4(m) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) 14 SONN and TOON, MARCH 8, 2024 DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 5, 2024, the Court found service of Plaintiff’s Complaint appropriate as to 18 Defendants Sonn and Toon and directed Plaintiff to complete service documents and return them 19 to the Court within 30 days. (See Doc. No. 14). The Court warned Plaintiff that “[t]he failure to 20 comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.” (Id. at 2, ¶ 5). To date, Plaintiff 21 has not returned the service documents and the time to do so has expired. 22 “If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court – on 23 motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff – must dismiss the action without prejudice 24 against that defendant or order that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.