Bryson

Bryson v. West Coast Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20241:23-cv-00193California2,162 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

7

8 TEDDI A. BRYSON, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:23-cv-00193-JLT-SKO

10 v. ORDER VACATING HEARING AND

DENYING DEFENDANT WEST COAST

11 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S

UNOPPOSED EX PARTE

WEST COAST LIFE INSURANCE

12 COMPANY, A SUP BPL POIC EA NT AI O ON N F NO OR N L -PE AA RV TE Y T JO A SS OER NV E 13 Defendant. B RYSON VIA HIS COUNSEL 14 _____________ ____________________ ___/ ( Doc. 14)

15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 On February 1, 2024, Defendant West Coast Life Insurance Company (“Defendant”) filed 18 an “Unopposed Ex Parte Application for Leave to Serve Subpoena on Non-Party Jason Bryson Via 19 His Counsel” (the “Ex Parte Application”). (Doc. 14.) Defendant filed its “Joint Statement re 20 Discovery Disagreement” directed to the Ex Parte Application, as required by this Court’s Local 21 Rule 251, on February 14, 2024 (the “Joint Statement”).1 (Doc. 18.) The Court has reviewed the 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.