Bryson
Bryson v. West Coast Life Insurance Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6
7
8 TEDDI A. BRYSON, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:23-cv-00193-JLT-SKO
10 v. ORDER VACATING HEARING AND
DENYING DEFENDANT WEST COAST
11 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S
UNOPPOSED EX PARTE
WEST COAST LIFE INSURANCE
12 COMPANY, A SUP BPL POIC EA NT AI O ON N F NO OR N L -PE AA RV TE Y T JO A SS OER NV E 13 Defendant. B RYSON VIA HIS COUNSEL 14 _____________ ____________________ ___/ ( Doc. 14)
15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 On February 1, 2024, Defendant West Coast Life Insurance Company (“Defendant”) filed 18 an “Unopposed Ex Parte Application for Leave to Serve Subpoena on Non-Party Jason Bryson Via 19 His Counsel” (the “Ex Parte Application”). (Doc. 14.) Defendant filed its “Joint Statement re 20 Discovery Disagreement” directed to the Ex Parte Application, as required by this Court’s Local 21 Rule 251, on February 14, 2024 (the “Joint Statement”).1 (Doc. 18.) The Court has reviewed the 22 …