Borla

(HC) Jackson v. Borla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20241:24-cv-00143California1,499 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOUGLAS V. JACKSON, No. 1:24-cv-00143-HBK (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

14 EDWARD BORLA, Warden, DISMISS PETITION FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM1

15 Respondent.

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

16 (Doc. No. 1) 17 18 Petitioner Douglas V. Jackson (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner, is proceeding on his pro se 19 petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 docketed on February 1, 2024. (Doc. 20 No. 1, “Petition”). This matter is before the Court for preliminary review. See Rules Governing 21 § 2254 Cases, Rule 4; 28 U.S.C. § 2243. For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends 22 that the Petition be DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable habeas claim. 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 Petitioner is serving an indeterminate 48-year-to-life sentence stemming from his 25 December 1, 2008 conviction for Attempted Murder of a Peace Officer, Attempted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.