(SS) Cummings v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20241:23-cv-00371California3,904 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEANNETTE CUMMINGS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00371-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING

13 v. DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE TO COMMISSIONER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY 2

15 SECURITY,1 (Doc. Nos. 12, 16) 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 Jeannette Cummings (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 20 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for 21 disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently 22 before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 23 12, 16-17). For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for 24 summary judgment, denies Defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, and remands the 25

26 1 The Court has substituted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.