Kumar
Kumar v. Bardini
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 KULDEEP KUMAR, Case No. 1:23-cv-01658-NODJ-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO CLOSE v. CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL EMILIA BARDINI, et al., PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 8)
17 On February 16, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the entire action without prejudice. (ECF No. 9.) Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). In light of the notice of dismissal, this action has…