(PC) Barra v. Tulare County Sheriff's Office Department

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY LAWRENCE BARRA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01756-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

14 TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE

DEPARTMENT, MARCH 20, 2024 DEADLINE

15 Defendant.1 16 17 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is the pro se civil rights 18 complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Anthony Lawrence Barra—a state prisoner/pretrial 19 detainee. (Doc. No. 1, Complaint). Upon review, the Court finds the Complaint is subject to 20 dismissal. Notably, Plaintiff admits on the face of the Complaint he did not fully exhaust his 21 administrative remedies before he initiated this action. 22 The Complaint concerns events stemming from Plaintiff’s confinement at the Bob Wiley 23 Detention Facility. (Id. at 3). Plaintiff complains that: 24 Sheriffs are not giving my 10 hours a week. Mrs. Murphy said on Wednesday I used …