(PS) Murphy v. AFSCME Union Local 257

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANNON O. MURPHY, Sr., Case No. 2:23-cv-01627-TLN-JDP

12 Plaintiff,

13 v.

ORDER

14 AFSCME UNION LOCAL 257, 15 Defendants. 16 17 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 18 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 24, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and 19 recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any 20 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time 21 to file objections has passed, and no objections were filed. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 25 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 26 Having reviewed the file, the…