Ramadan

(PC) Sherman v. Ramadan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20241:20-cv-01609California362 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUSTIN SHERMAN, No. 1:20-cv-01609 JLT GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. (Doc. 36)

14 RAMADAN, ORDER DISMISSING MATTER FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

15 Defendant. TO OBEY COURT ORDER

16 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS

17 MOOT (Doc. 28) 18 19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights 20 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 21 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On January 29, 2024, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations to 23 dismiss this action for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order. (Doc. 36.) The 24 Court served the Findings and Recommendations on the Plaintiff and notified him that any 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.