Faggianelli

(PC) Hash v. Faggianelli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20242:17-cv-01721California995 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH., No. 2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. RALLOS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, and has filed motions for an extension of time and to appoint counsel. ECF Nos. 161, 162. I. Motion for Extension of Time Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time, up to March 13, 2024, to file a reply in support of his motions to compel discovery. ECF No. 161. Good cause appearing, the request for extension of time will be granted. However, plaintiff is cautioned that given the age of this case and the time that has already been devoted to his motions to compel, no additional extensions of time will be granted. II. Motion to Appoint Counsel Plaintiff has also requested the appointment of counsel for the limited purpose of re- opening discovery and conducting depositions. ECF No. 162. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.