Leaser
Leaser v. Prime Ascot, L.P.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHA LEASER, et al., individually, No. 2:20-CV-02502-DJC-AC and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER
v.
PRIME ASCOT, L.P, et al., Defendants 17 Defendants Prime Ascot, L.P., Prime Ascot Acquisition, LLC, Prime/Park LaBrea Titleholder, LLC, and Prime Administration, LLC (“Defendants”) bring the present Motion to Strike seeking to strike all allegations related to a previously dismissed set of defendants from the operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Defendants also request, in the alternative, that the Court join the previously dismissed defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19. As discussed below, there is no basis to strike the allegations in the SAC, and it is not feasible to join the previously dismissed defendants. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion is DENIED. //// //// //// I. Background A. Factual Background Plaintiffs bring the present action against Defendants Prime…